<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Airborne Molecular Contamination Monitoring and Control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.particlecounters.org/blog/airborne-molecular-contamination-monitoring-and-control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.particlecounters.org/blog/airborne-molecular-contamination-monitoring-and-control/</link>
	<description>A blog dedicated to particle counters with information about particle counter technology, applications, cleanrooms and related topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:03:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rod</title>
		<link>http://www.particlecounters.org/blog/airborne-molecular-contamination-monitoring-and-control/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 19:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.particlecounters.org/blog/airborne-molecular-contamination-monitoring-and-control/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Emmett,

Thanks for taking the time to post on our blog. If you are wanting to measure airborne lead particles, you will probably not want to use a laser particle counter due to the fact that it will only count particles and has no way of determining the substance of the particles.

You can however detect lead particle by either gathering samples on a filter media and sending samples to an &lt;a title=&quot;Environmental Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.aiha.org/Content/LQAP/accred/ELLAP.htm&quot;&gt;ELLAP (Environmental Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program)&lt;/a&gt; lab to determine if lead is present or to use a portable &lt;a title=&quot;x-ray fluorescence (XRF)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray_fluorescence&quot;&gt;x-ray fluorescence (XRF)&lt;/a&gt; machine. I would suggest reading some of the following articles that pertain to airborne testing for lead and other toxic metals.

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a title=&quot;Practicality of Using air Lead Measurements by Portable X-Ray Fluorescence&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.ohiolink.edu/etd/view.cgi?ucin1022196683&quot;&gt;Practicality of Using air Lead Measurements by Portable X-Ray Fluorescence&lt;/a&gt; to Manage Worker Protection Programs&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt; &lt;a title=&quot;Emerging Portable X-ray Fluorescence Technology for Measuring Multiple Airborne Metals: An Evaluation of A Battery Powered X-Ray Tube Instrument&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.aiha.org/aihce03/handouts/po127lawryk.pdf&quot;&gt;Emerging Portable X-ray Fluorescence Technology for Measuring Multiple Airborne Metals&lt;/a&gt;: An Evaluation of A Battery Powered X-Ray Tube Instrument&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;
&lt;a title=&quot;History of XRF - Timeline of X-ray Physics and X-ray Spectrometry&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.niton.com/history_xrf.asp&quot;&gt;History of XRF - Timeline of X-ray Physics and X-ray Spectrometry&lt;/a&gt; (1951 - present)&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
As for &lt;a title=&quot;radioactive particles&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://pdg.web.cern.ch/pdg/cpep/radio_part.html&quot;&gt;radioactive particles&lt;/a&gt;, if you simply wanted to measure particle that you know are radioactive and know the quantity and size, you can use a particle counter (nobody will accept it back for service though). Keep in mind that no particle counter will tell you if the particles are radioactive or not. You may be better off sampling the particles into a filter and then measuring for radioactive contamination.

SEE: &lt;a title=&quot;Methods for Detecting Radioactivity in the Environment&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://itu.jrc.ec.europa.eu/index.php?id=198&quot;&gt;Analytical Techniques for Environmental Particles&lt;/a&gt;
I hope this information helps. If you have any questions, please feel free to post them here. We also invite others to join in this discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emmett,</p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time to post on our blog. If you are wanting to measure airborne lead particles, you will probably not want to use a laser particle counter due to the fact that it will only count particles and has no way of determining the substance of the particles.</p>
<p>You can however detect lead particle by either gathering samples on a filter media and sending samples to an <a title="Environmental Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program" target="_blank" href="http://www.aiha.org/Content/LQAP/accred/ELLAP.htm">ELLAP (Environmental Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program)</a> lab to determine if lead is present or to use a portable <a title="x-ray fluorescence (XRF)" target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray_fluorescence">x-ray fluorescence (XRF)</a> machine. I would suggest reading some of the following articles that pertain to airborne testing for lead and other toxic metals.</p>
<p><strong><a title="Practicality of Using air Lead Measurements by Portable X-Ray Fluorescence" target="_blank" href="http://www.ohiolink.edu/etd/view.cgi?ucin1022196683">Practicality of Using air Lead Measurements by Portable X-Ray Fluorescence</a> to Manage Worker Protection Programs</strong></p>
<p><strong> <a title="Emerging Portable X-ray Fluorescence Technology for Measuring Multiple Airborne Metals: An Evaluation of A Battery Powered X-Ray Tube Instrument" target="_blank" href="http://www.aiha.org/aihce03/handouts/po127lawryk.pdf">Emerging Portable X-ray Fluorescence Technology for Measuring Multiple Airborne Metals</a>: An Evaluation of A Battery Powered X-Ray Tube Instrument</strong></p>
<p><strong><br />
<a title="History of XRF - Timeline of X-ray Physics and X-ray Spectrometry" target="_blank" href="http://www.niton.com/history_xrf.asp">History of XRF &#8211; Timeline of X-ray Physics and X-ray Spectrometry</a> (1951 &#8211; present)</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong><br />
As for <a title="radioactive particles" target="_blank" href="http://pdg.web.cern.ch/pdg/cpep/radio_part.html">radioactive particles</a>, if you simply wanted to measure particle that you know are radioactive and know the quantity and size, you can use a particle counter (nobody will accept it back for service though). Keep in mind that no particle counter will tell you if the particles are radioactive or not. You may be better off sampling the particles into a filter and then measuring for radioactive contamination.</p>
<p>SEE: <a title="Methods for Detecting Radioactivity in the Environment" target="_blank" href="http://itu.jrc.ec.europa.eu/index.php?id=198">Analytical Techniques for Environmental Particles</a><br />
I hope this information helps. If you have any questions, please feel free to post them here. We also invite others to join in this discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emmett O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://www.particlecounters.org/blog/airborne-molecular-contamination-monitoring-and-control/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Emmett O'Brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 22:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.particlecounters.org/blog/airborne-molecular-contamination-monitoring-and-control/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Dear Sir,
I am connected with the Aviation Industry and I have had an inquiry to periodically monitor the &quot;airborne lead&quot; levels over a city. Can you supply me with the necessary airborne sampling sensors and priovide me with test monitoring results.

Also there has been an inquiry to provide &quot;radioactive airborne&quot; sampling over a nuclear reactor.

I would appreciate any assistance as I know nothing of these processes.

Your&#039;s Sincerely,
EMMETT O&#039;BRIEN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sir,<br />
I am connected with the Aviation Industry and I have had an inquiry to periodically monitor the &#8220;airborne lead&#8221; levels over a city. Can you supply me with the necessary airborne sampling sensors and priovide me with test monitoring results.</p>
<p>Also there has been an inquiry to provide &#8220;radioactive airborne&#8221; sampling over a nuclear reactor.</p>
<p>I would appreciate any assistance as I know nothing of these processes.</p>
<p>Your&#8217;s Sincerely,<br />
EMMETT O&#8217;BRIEN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Particle Counter Blog &#187; Difference Between Cleanroom Certification and Monitoring</title>
		<link>http://www.particlecounters.org/blog/airborne-molecular-contamination-monitoring-and-control/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Particle Counter Blog &#187; Difference Between Cleanroom Certification and Monitoring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 16:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.particlecounters.org/blog/airborne-molecular-contamination-monitoring-and-control/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>[...] ISO 14644-2 also dictates that cleanroom particle classifications in areas cleaner than ISO class 5 require a time interval of at least six months between demonstrations of adherence to ISO 14644-1. And any areas that are less clean than ISO Class 5 require a 12-month maximum interval between displays of compliance. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ISO 14644-2 also dictates that cleanroom particle classifications in areas cleaner than ISO class 5 require a time interval of at least six months between demonstrations of adherence to ISO 14644-1. And any areas that are less clean than ISO Class 5 require a 12-month maximum interval between displays of compliance. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
